As the rumors foreshadowed, the State of Play announced the spin-off of the series Metro – exclusive for virtual reality. It seems that he will not affect the production of the next number of rooms, because he is engaged in a spin-off completely different company.
Here’s what the developers talk about Metro AWAKENING:
The main character is the doctor Serdar looking for his wife. He has to cross the line of the possibilities of his mind and arouse the supernatural essence into which he will once turn.
IN AWAKENING They will retain the branded features of the series: the gameplay will become a mixture of survival, stealth and open shootings. The lamp has to be reloaded manually, the weapon will be assembled again from what came from, and you will have to monitor the state of gas mask.
Creators Metro AWAKENING – publisher and developer Vertigo Games. This is one of the largest VR companies that made a name for Arizona Sunshine And After the Fall. Studio 4A Games direct participation in production AWAKENING does not accept and, apparently, continues to work on the next number Metro .
Metro AWAKENING They are going to release during the 2024th through Quest 2 and 3, PSVR2 and Steamvr.
February 1, 2024 Total surveillance and revolution in the judas shooter trailer
February 1, 2024 In Alan Wake II, https://reefspinscasino.co.uk/ you can now reduce the number of scamers
Metro 2033
Metro: Last Light
Metro: Exodus
Metro: AWAKENING VR
The best comments
Lol) game about the Moscow metro, but we will not translate it into Russian))
Read carefully please.
I’m not talking about BP, but about some 4 part.
and what is the problem that they make games in one universe? Games are high -quality and well sold. Also take into account the facts that 4A Games is a small studio with a composition less than 200 people. And the transition to new engines and the creation of new worlds risky and costly business. At the same time, more powerful colleagues in the workshop are engaged in the same: CD Project up to the 20th G released only a witcher, and Cyberpank was made on the same engine, Betesda with its series of scrolls and a phalaut on its own engine. GSC World also feels comfortable with 2 series Cossack and Stalker, Lariana to BG3 made only divinity games and BG3 was also made on his engine.
Not scary. I could write less ambiguously, but I was in Hops.
The game is declared not only on the PC helmet, but also on quests. And there are a lot of them sold.
He talks about the fourth game in a row in the same universe from the same developments. He does not say anything else. Such a game is made? Made. This is mentioned in the news? Mentioned. The fact that someone he specified there-the problems of the deliberate.
I read carefully, the user writes that 4 games already at 4Games. Although the VR game makes a different developer in general.
More than 20 million quests. This is not enough?
And the engine is here and? 4A has excellent technologies, why change them? For example: Rockstar since 2006 (starting with test tennis) makes all its games on one engine, this does not affect the variety of projects)))
Because you need to look at the engine, maybe he will give something else. But I don’t rummage for it. If 4a Engine, using manipulations, can make fantasy from the fantasy and vice versa, as prostects, gazebo or obsidians with Outer Worlds/Avowed (but there is already UE), then MB should try. And if you make the same shooter on the same engine but in other decorations, then this is a controversial solution, but it can work if you try to good design/plot
Bro, this is not the case) the engine is just a tool. The main thing is the hands that work with him. Take, for example, the same UE – what just did not go out on it. And given the fact that 4a has high-class pros (partly, they made the X-Ray Engine, on which the Stalker trilog is running, and this engine, without exaggeration, was cool)-they will do anything, on the current tool, the main thing would be good ideas, scenario and financing.
And this is not on the way? From his comment it is not clear about what it is about, as if I thought so, reading his comment. Now, if he wrote: “It is a pity that 4G does the 4th part in the same universe, if only they burned out because of this” then, yes, there is no dispute. And that is not a fact, it can be a high.
In this news, in general, about another project, we are talking about, so his comment can work both there and there.
